The platforms closed matters sit in

E-discovery data and AI: what review platforms' terms say

Most of a litigation archive lives in a review or processing platform. Its terms decide what the firm can take out, and what the platform may do with what was loaded.

Ask about the firm's material

Ownership of what is loaded

Reveal (Logikcull)
The customer is and will remain the sole and exclusive owner of all hosted data.
Casepoint
The customer owns all customer data and keeps the liabilities of collecting and holding it.
Nuix
As between Nuix and the licensee, the licensee owns the licensee data.

Source: Litigation support software terms on matter data

AI training

5 platforms on our board say they will not train on a firm's material. LexisNexis states that subscriber inputs will not be used to train any large language model, and Casepoint that it will not use AI inputs and outputs for AI training without customer approval.

Leaving the platform

  • Logikcull makes hosted data available for export or download for up to thirty days after the subscription ends, then deletes it.
  • Casepoint offers an export of all customer data in a common format of its choosing on termination.
  • Harvey securely deletes remaining customer data within 30 days of termination unless told otherwise.

Source: Litigation support software terms on matter data

An export is the firm's copy, not a licence to share it: the client's confidence goes with it. The rules are on who owns the client file.

Describe the firm's closed matters

A client's file needs that client's release; the firm's own precedents do not. Tell us which material you mean and where it is held, and we will reply in writing.

The archive in question
  • Each enquiry from a firm is read by a person
  • No platform or buyer on these pages sees what you send
  • Do not include client names, matter numbers or documents

Sources

This site's own datasets, every figure quoted from its source and dated:

  1. Relativity, terms of use
  2. Everlaw, customer terms of service
  3. Everlaw, privacy notice
  4. DISCO, ediscovery product terms
  5. DISCO, privacy policy
  6. Reveal, Logikcull terms of service
  7. Casepoint, standard terms and conditions
  8. Nuix, end user licence agreement (8 August 2025)

Ask what the firm could offer on its own account

A client's file needs that client's release; the firm's own precedents do not. Tell us which material you mean and where it is held, and we will reply in writing.

Ask about the firm's material