The buyers who publish

Who buys case files for AI, and what each says it needs

Mercor's listing asks law firms for closed matters by name. Other organisations we read take legal documents among company records in general.

Ask about the firm's material

The listing written for law firms

Mercor's Law Firm listing, published on 17 October 2026 and read by us on 29 October 2026, asks to license complete files from closed matters and completed deals: pleadings and discovery productions from concluded litigation, data rooms and contracts from transactions. It says single matters with hundreds or thousands of documents are the most valuable, that everything is anonymized and active matters are excluded, and it names Relativity, Everlaw, iManage, NetDocuments and Clio among the tools.

Its requirements include client consent, or documents that can be fully anonymized, and privileged material clients will not release is not a fit. Those are what one buyer asks; the conduct rules on our provisions board, on revealing information relating to a representation and on privilege, still apply to the firm.

Grepped
Lists docs, contracts and reports among the written record it takes, and says the data stays under the owner's control until a buyer purchases.
micro1, under its legal heading
Names policies, contract workflows and review processes under legal and contracts.
Mode, the data buyer
Offers legal services as an industry and de-identifies the agreed copy before paying.

Source: Who takes law firm and case file data for AI

5 of the 10 organisations on our buyer board name legal work at all. The rest take company records of any kind.

Describe the firm's closed matters

A client's file needs that client's release; the firm's own precedents do not. Tell us which material you mean and where it is held, and we will reply in writing.

The archive in question
  • Each enquiry from a firm is read by a person
  • No platform or buyer on these pages sees what you send
  • Do not include client names, matter numbers or documents

Sources

This site's own datasets, every figure quoted from its source and dated:

  1. Relativity, terms of use
  2. Everlaw, customer terms of service
  3. Everlaw, privacy notice
  4. DISCO, ediscovery product terms
  5. DISCO, privacy policy
  6. Reveal, Logikcull terms of service
  7. Casepoint, standard terms and conditions
  8. Nuix, end user licence agreement (8 August 2025)

Ask what the firm could offer on its own account

A client's file needs that client's release; the firm's own precedents do not. Tell us which material you mean and where it is held, and we will reply in writing.

Ask about the firm's material